A mid-sized specialty-materials manufacturer, a leading materials science company specializing in polymer technologies, engineered products, and specialized materials. Their products serve various industries, including construction, agriculture, transportation infrastructure, weather and fire protection, pharmaceuticals, nutrition, electronics, and design was running an inefficient Oracle POD that could no longer keep up with the plant floor or the back office.
Client knew that for its business to scale and stay competitive, they needed more than just system upgrades—and needed operational clarity. This initiative wasn’t just about fixing what was broken; it was about building a foundation for smarter manufacturing, tighter financial controls, and a roadmap that supports its long-term growth and acquisitions.
Chief Financial Officer mentioned- “As we looked to expand operational efficiency and prepare for future growth, it became clear that our legacy ERP setup was holding us back. Our vision was to modernize core processes—particularly around costing, manufacturing, and financial reporting—while laying the foundation for a scalable Oracle platform to support innovation and global expansion.”
Client: Material Science Company
Industry: Chemical Manufacturing
Size: 600 employees
Location: Toronto
The company was facing major performance bottlenecks within its Oracle system, especially in core functions such as manufacturing execution, cost control, and financial reporting. These technical lags led to growing operational inefficiencies—slowing down decision-making, increasing manual workarounds, and limiting return on ERP investment. Without a strategic framework for future scalability, the organization was struggling to align technology with its long-term growth and integration goals.
Bottleneck | Day-to-Day Impact |
System lag in manufacturing & costing | MRP and cost-roll processes regularly stretched past the night shift, delaying shop-floor schedules by up to 3 hours per week. |
Fragmented data flow | Drill-downs from Oracle Process Manufacturing (OPM) to General Ledger broke on one in five transactions, forcing finance to spend 10–12 hours each month hunting for missing detail. |
Heavy customization | More than 1,400 custom objects made every patch risky and kept annual support fees high. |
Slow month-end close | Close took 7 full days, with half that time consumed by manual reconciliations and variance research. |
No future roadmap | The IT team had no clear path to adopt new Oracle modules or sunset costly bolt-ons, limiting the company’s ability to scale or acquire. |
Over a focused 20-week program the joint business–IT team tackled the root causes rather than applying another layer of “quick fixes”:
Before vs. After
Outcome | Before | After | Benefit |
Custom code footprint | 1,400 objects | 910 objects | -35 % custom code, lowering support hours and patch effort |
Manufacturing transaction runtime | 15 sec / txn | 12 sec / txn | -20 % faster throughput in first quarter |
Cost-variance accuracy | ±25 % swing | ±5 % swing | ↑20 pp accuracy; tighter forecast and margin control |
Month-end close | 7.0 days | 4.9 days | -30 % cycle time; 2 extra days for analysis |
Finance reporting errors | 1 in 22 reports | 1 in 27 reports | ↑18 % accuracy |
Maintenance & license spend | Baseline | -20 % | Savings driven by smaller custom footprint |
ERP expansion ROI | — | 25 % projected over 3 yrs | Clear business case for future Oracle modules |
“We went from firefighting system slowdowns to trusting the numbers on day one of close. Cutting our custom code by a third not only saves money—it lets us adopt new Oracle functionality without fear. The roadmap gives us a clear runway for growth and acquisitions.”
— Chief Information Officer
We have the experience, knowledge, and flexibility to help you with business transformation, hybrid workplace strategy, technology implementation and adoption, and more.